Usenet 1993 July

home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search

/ Usenet 1993 July / InfoMagic USENET CD-ROM July 1993.ISO / answers / dec-faq / pdp8 < prev next >

Wrap

Text File | 1993-06-09 | 37.7 KB | 827 lines

Newsgroups: alt.sys.pdp8,alt.answers,news.answers Path: senator-bedfellow.mit.edu!enterpoop.mit.edu!gatech!howland.reston.ans.net!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!hobbes.physics.uiowa.edu!news.uiowa.edu!news From: jones@cs.uiowa.edu (Douglas W. Jones) Subject: PDP-8 Frequently Asked Questions (posted every other month) Summary: Answers to common questions about antique DEC PDP-8 computers. Those posting to alt.sys.pdp8 should read this. Sender: news@news.uiowa.edu (News) Message-ID: <1993Jun9.173754.27638@news.uiowa.edu> Approved: news-answers-request@MIT.Edu Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1993 17:37:54 GMT Expires: Sat, 8 Aug 1992 08:08:08 GMT Nntp-Posting-Host: pyrite.cs.uiowa.edu Organization: Computer Science, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA Keywords: FAQ DEC PDP 8 Followup-To: alt.sys.pdp8 Lines: 808 Xref: senator-bedfellow.mit.edu alt.sys.pdp8:233 alt.answers:395 news.answers:9225 Archive-name: dec-faq/pdp8 Last-modified: May. 12, 1993 Frequently Asked Questions about the DEC PDP-8 computer. By Douglas Jones, jones@cs.uiowa.edu (with help from many folks) Contents What is a PDP? What is a PDP-8? What is the PDP-8 instruction set? What does PDP-8 assembly language look like? What different PDP-8 models were made? What about the LINC-8 and PDP-12? Where can I get a PDP-8 today? Where can I get PDP-8 documentation? What operating systems were written for the PDP-8? What programming languages were supported on the PDP-8? Where can I get PDP-8 software? Where can I get additional information? What use is a PDP-8 today? Who's Who? What is a PDP? For over a decade, all programmable digital computers sold by Digital Equipment Corporation were sold as Programmed Data Processors (PDPs) instead of computers. I have DEC documentation that actually calls them "PDPs", so this is not improper usage. DEC's first computer, the PDP-1, had a selling price of only $120,000 at a time when competing machines were selling for over $1,000,000. Everyone (the government and DEC's stockholders included) knew that computers were big and expensive and needed a computer center and a large staff; DEC chose to avoid dealing with these stereotypes by entirely avoiding the term "computer". DEC built a number of different computers under the PDP label, with a huge range of price and performance. The largest of these are fully worthy of large computer centers with big support staffs. Many early DEC computers were not really built by DEC. With the PDP-3 and LINC, for example, customers built the machines using DEC parts and facilities; the PDP-5 may also have been built on this basis. Here is the list of PDP computers: MODEL DATE PRICE BITS COMMENTS ===== ==== ======== ==== ===== PDP-1 1960 $120,000 18 DEC's first computer PDP-2 NA 24 Never built? PDP-3 36 One was built by a customer, not by DEC. PDP-4 1962 18 Predecessor of the PDP-7. PDP-5 1963 $27,000 12 The ancestor of the PDP-8. PDP-6 1964 36 A big computer; 23 built, most for MIT. PDP-7 1965 ~$60,000 18 Widely used for real-time control. PDP-8 1965 $18,500 12 The smallest and least expensive PDP. PDP-9 1966 $35,000 18 An upgrade of the PDP-7. PDP-10 1967 36 A PDP-6 successor, great for timesharing. PDP-11 1970 $10,800 16 DEC's first and only 16 bit computer. PDP-12 1969 $27,900 12 A PDP-8 relative. PDP-13 NA Bad luck, there was no such machine. PDP-14 A ROM-based programmable controller. PDP-15 1970 $16,500 18 A TTL upgrade of the PDP-9. PDP-16 1972 NA 8/16 A register-transfer module system. Corrections and additions to this list are welcome! The prices given above are the prices for minimal systems in the year the machine was first introduced. The bits column indicates the word size. It's worth noting that the DEC PDP-10 became the DECSYSTEM-20 as a result of marketing considerations, and DEC's VAX series of computers began as the Virtual Address eXtension of the never-produced PDP-11/78. It is worth mentioning that there are persistant rumors that the the Data General Nova was originally developed as the PDP-X, a 16-bit multi-register version of the PDP-8. A prototype PDP-X was apparently built at DEC before the design was rejected. This and a competing 16-bit design were apparently submitted to Harold McFarland at Carnegie-Mellon University for evaluation; McFarland (and possibly also Gordon Bell, who was at C-MU at the time) evaluated the competing designs and rejected both in favor of the design now known as the PDP-11. (A less common variant on this story is that the reason that DEC never produced a PDP-13 was because this number was assigned to what became the Nova; this is unlikely because the PDP-X prototype predated the PDP-11.) Both DEC and Data General don't talk publically about these stories. Today, all of the PDP machines are in DEC's corporate past, with the exception of the PDP-11 family of minicomputers and microprocessors. What is a PDP-8? The PDP-8 family of minicomputers were built by Digital Equipment corporation between 1965 and 1990 (if you include the PDP-5, the starting date should be 1963). These machines were characterized by a 12 bit word, with no hardware byte structure, a 4K minimum memory configuration, and a simple but powerful instruction set. By 1970, the PDP-8 was the best selling computer in the world, and many models of the PDP-8 set new records as the least expensive computer on the market. The PDP-8 has been described as the model-T of the computer industry because it was the first computer to be mass produced at a cost that just about anyone could afford. C. Gordon Bell (who later was chief architect of the PDP-11 and who, as Vice President, oversaw the development of the VAX) says that the basic idea of the PDP-8 was not really original with him. He gives credit to Seymour Cray (of CDC and later Cray) for the idea of a single-accumulator 12 bit minicomputer. Cray's CDC 160 family, sold starting around 1959, certainly was a very similar 12 bit architecture, and the peripheral processors of Cray's first supercomputer, the CDC 6600, are also familiar to PDP-8 programmers. Note that the CDC 160 and CDC 6600 peripheral processors had 6 basic addressing modes, with variable length instruction words and other features that were far from the simple elegance of the PDP-8. Despite its many modes, the CDC architecture lacked the notion of current page addressing, and the result is that for examples that don't involve indexing, PDP-8 code is frequently just as effective as the code on the more complex CDC 12-bit minicomputers. What is the PDP-8 instruction set? The PDP-8 word size is 12 bits, and the basic memory is 4K words. The minimal CPU contained the following registers: PC - the program counter, 12 bits. AC - the accumulator, 12 bits. L - the link, 1 bit, commonly prefixed to AC as <L,AC>. It is worth noting that many operations such as procedure linkage and indexing, which are usually thought of as involving registers, are done with memory on the PDP-8 family. Instruction words are organized as follows: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ |_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_| | | | | | | op |i|z| addr | op - the opcode. i - the indirect bit (0 = direct, 1 = indirect). z - the page bit (0 = page zero, 1 = current page). addr - the word in page. The top 5 bits of the 12 bit program counter give the current page, and memory addressing is also complicated by the fact that absolute memory locations 8 through 15 are incremented prior to use when used for indirect addressing. These locations are called the auto-index registers (despite the fact that they are in memory), and they allow the formulation of very tightly coded array operations. The basic instructions are: 000 - AND - and operand with AC. 001 - TAD - add operand to <L,AC> (a 13 bit value). 010 - ISZ - increment operand and skip if result is zero. 011 - DCA - deposit AC in memory and clear AC. 100 - JMS - jump to subroutine. 101 - JMP - jump. 110 - IOT - input/output transfer. 111 - OPR - microcoded operations. The ISZ and other skip instructions conditionally skip the next instruction in sequence. The ISZ is commonly used to increment a loop counter and skip if done, and it is also used as an general increment instruction, either followed by a no-op or in contexts where it is known that the result will never be zero. The subroutine calling sequence involves putting the return address in relative word zero of the subroutine, with execution starting with relative word one. Return from subroutine is done with an indirect jump through the return address. Subroutines frequently increment their return addresses to index through inline parameter lists or to provide return codes by conditionally skipping the next instruction. The IOT instruction has the following form: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ |1|1|0|_|_|_|_|_|_|t|c|s| | | | | | | device | op | The IOT instruction specifies one of up to 8 operations on one of 64 devices. Typically (but not universally), each bit of the op field evokes an operation as follows: If the s bit is set, the instruction causes a skip if the device is ready, if the c bit is set, the device ready status is reset and, for some devices, AC is also cleared, and if the t bit is set, data is either ored with AC or output from AC to the device. Prior to the PDP-8/E, there were severe restrictions on the interpretation of the t, c and s bits. IOT instructions may be used to initiate data break transfers from block devices such as disk or tape. The term "data break" was, for years, DEC's preferred term for cycle-stealing direct-memory- access data transfers. Some CPU functions are accessed only by IOT instructions. For example, interrupt enable and disable are IOT instructions, as are instructions controlling the optional memory management unit that is needed to address more than 4K words. A wide variety of operations are available through the OPR microcoded instructions: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Group 1 |1|1|1|0|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|_| 1 - CLA - clear AC 1 - CLL - clear the L bit 1 - CMA - ones complement AC 1 - CML - complement L bit 1 - IAC - increment <L,AC> 1 0 0 - RAR - rotate <L,AC> right 0 1 0 - RAL - rotate <L,AC> left 1 0 1 - RTR - rotate <L,AC> right twice 0 1 1 - RTL - rotate <L,AC> left twice In general, the above operations can be combined by oring the bit patterns for the desired operations into a single instruction. If none of the bits are set, the result is the NOP instruction. When these operations are combined, they operate top to bottom in the order shown above. The exception to this is that IAC cannot be combined with the rotate operations on some models, and attempts to combine rotate operations have different effects from one model to another (for example, on the PDP-8/E, the rotate code 001 means swap 6 bit bytes in the accumulator, while previous models took this to mean something like "shift neither left nor right 2 bits"). _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Group 2 |1|1|1|1|_|_|_|_|_|_|_|0| 1 0 - SMA - skip on AC < 0 \ 1 0 - SZA - skip on AC = 0 > or 1 0 - SNL - skip on L /= 0 / 0 0 0 1 - SKP - skip unconditionally 1 1 - SPA - skip on AC >= 0 \ 1 1 - SNA - skip on AC /= 0 > and 1 1 - SZL - skip on L = 0 / 1 - CLA - clear AC 1 - OSR - or switches with AC 1 - HLT - halt The above operations may be combined by oring them together, except that there are two distinct incompatible groups of skip instructions. When combined, SMA, SZA and SNL, skip if one or the other of the indicated conditions are true, while SPA, SNA and SZL skip if all of the indicated conditions are true (logical and). When combined, these operate top to bottom in the order shown; thus, the accumulator may be tested and then cleared. Setting the halt bit in a skip instruction is a crude but useful way to set a breakpoint for front-panel debugging. If none of the bits are set, the result is an alternative form of no-op. A third group of operate microinstructions (with a 1 in the least significant bit) deals with the optional extended arithmetic element to allow such things as hardware multiply and divide, 24 bit shift operations, and normalize. These operations involve an additional data register, MQ or multiplier quotient, and a small step count register. On the PDP-8/E and successors, MQ and the instructions for loading and storing it were always present, even when the EAE was absent, and the EAE was extended to provide a useful variety of 24 bit arithmetic operations. What does PDP-8 assembly language look like? Here is an example: START, CLA CLL / Clear everything TAD X / Load X AND I Y / And with the value pointed to by Y DCA X / Store in X HLT / Halt X, 1 / A variable Y, 7 / A pointer Note that labels are terminated by a comma, and comments are separated from the code by a slash. There are no fixed fields or column restrictions. The "CLA CLL" instruction on the first line is an example of the microcoding of two of the Group 1 operate instructions. CLA alone has the code 7200 (octal), while CLL has the code 7100; combining these as "CLA CLL" produces 7300, the instruction to clear both AC and the link bit. As a general rule, except when memory reference instructions are involved, the assembler simply ors together the values of all blank separated fields between the label and comment. Indirection is indicated by the special symbol I in the operand field, as in the third line of the example. The typical PDP-8 assembler has no explicit notation to distinguish between page zero and current page addresses. Instead, the assembler is expected to note the page holding the operand and automatically generate the appropriate mode. If the operand is neither in the current page nor page zero, some assemblers will raise an error, others will automatically generate an indirect pointer to the off-page operand (This feature should be avoided!). Note, in the final two lines of the example, that there is no "define constant" pseudo-operation. Instead, where a constant is to be assembled into memory, the constant takes the place of the op-code field. The PDP-8 has no immediate addressing mode, but some assemblers provide an optional mechanism to allow the programmer to ignore this lack: TAD (3) / add 3, from memory on the current page. TAD [5] / add 5, from memory on page zero. JMP I (LAB) / jump indirect through the address of LAB. Assemblers that support this automatically fill the end of each page with constants defined in this way that have been accumulated during the assembly of that page. Arithmetic is allowed in operand fields and constant definitions, but expressions are evaluated in strict left-to-right order, as shown below: TAD X+1 / add the contents of the location after X. TAD (X-1) / add the address of the location before X. Other operators allowed included and (&), or (!), multiply (^) and divide (%), as well as a unary sign (+ or -). Unfortunately, one of the most widely used assemblers, PAL 8, has trouble when unary operators are mixed with multiplication or division. Generally, identifiers are not limited in length, but only the first 6 characters are significant. All numeric constants are in octal, unless a DECIMAL pseudo-op has been used to change number base (change back with the OCTAL pseudo-op). Other assembly language features are illustrated below: / Comments may stand on lines by themselves / Blank lines are allowed *200 / Set the assembly origin to 200 (octal) NL0002= CLA CLL CML RTL / Define new opcode NL0002. NL0002 / Use new opcode (load 0002 in AC) JMP .-1 / Jump to the previous instruction X1= 10 / Define X1 (an auto-index register address) TAD I X1 / Use autoindex register 1 IAC; RAL / Multiple instructions on one line $ / End of assembly The assembly file ends with a line containing a $ (dollar sign) not in a comment field. What different PDP-8 models were made? The total sales figure for the PDP-8 family is estimated at over 300,000 machines. Over 8500 of these were sold prior to 1970. During the PDP-8 production run, a number of models were made, as listed in the following table. Of these, the PDP-8/E is generally considered to be the definitive machine. If the PDP-8 is considered to be the Model T of the computer industry, perhaps the PDP-8/E should be considered to be the industry's Model A. MODEL DATES SALES COST TECHNOLOGY REMARKS PDP-5 63-65 Transistor Limited compatibility PDP-8 65-68 >1000 $18,500 Transistor Table-top or rack LINC-8 66-69 153 $38,500 Transistor Rack only PDP-8/S 66-70? >1000? $10,000 Transistor Incompatable, slow! PDP-8/I 68-70? >2000? $12,800 TTL Pedistal or rack PDP-8/L 68-70? >2000? $8,500 TTL Scaled down 8/I (1) PDP-12 69-71 3500 $27,900 TTL Followup to LINC-8 PDP-8/E 70-78 >10K? $7,390 TTL MSI Omnibus Table-top or rack PDP-8/F 72-78? >10K? <$7K TTL MSI Omnibus Based on 8/E CPU PDP-8/M 72-78? >10K? <$7K TTL MSI Omnibus OEM version of 8/F PDP-8/A 75-84? >10K? <$7K TTL LSI Omnibus New CPU or 8/E CPU VT78 (2)78-80 > ? Microprocessor Intersil IM6100 Dm I (3)80-84 Microprocessor Harris 6120 Dm II 82-86 $1,435 Microprocessor Harris 6120 Dm III 84-90 $2,695 Microprocessor Dm III+ 85-90 Microprocessor Notes (1) Memory upgrade to 32K words was eventually sold. (2) The VT78 was also known as the DECstation 78. (3) Dm stands for DECmate. When possible, the costs given in the above table are for a minimal system in the first year of production; for most PDP-8 systems, such a system would have 4K of main memory, a console teletype, and the minimal software needed to use the machine (FOCAL, BASIC, or a paper-tape based assembler). Additional information on costs and production is needed! The above list does not include many PDP-8 variants sold by DEC to meet the needs of various special users. For example, the Industrial-8 was really just a PDP-8/E with a different nameplate and color scheme. Burger King had thousands of PDP-8/M based point-of-sale systems with no standard peripherals. In addition, DEC made many peripheral controllers for the PDP-11 and PDP-15 that used IM6100 and 6120 microprocessors from Intersil and Harris. The last years of the PDP-8 family were dominated by the DECmate machines. DEC sold these primarily as word processing systems, and in the end, they chose to obscure the ability of the DECmate systems to run any software other than WPS, DEC's word processing system. The following PDP-8 compatible or semi-compatible machines were made and sold by others; very little is known about many of these: MODEL DATE MAKER, NOTES MP-12 6? Fabritek TPA 68? Hungarian, possibly a DEC PDP-8/L in drag DCC-112 70-71 Digital Computer Controls DCC-112H 71 Digital Computer Controls 6100 Sampler 7? Intersil, their IM6100 promotional kit Intercept 7? Intersil, based on IM6100 Intercept Jr 7? Intersil, based on IM6100 PCM-12 7? Pacific CyberMetrix, based on Intercept bus SBC-8 84-88 CESI, Based on IM6120, SCSI bus What about the LINC/8 and PDP-12? Wesley Clark, then at Lincoln Labs, developed the LINC, or Laboratory INstrumentation Computer, as a personal laboratory computer in the early 1960's. He developed it in response to the needs of Mary Brazier, a neurophysiologist at MIT who needed better laboratory tools. When Lincoln Labs decided that the LINC did not fit their mission, a group at the the National Institute of Health funded an experiment to see if the LINC would be a productive tool in the life sciences. As a result of this project, 12 LINCs were built and debugged, each by its eventual user. The LINC was built using DEC's first family of logic modules, and along with the CDC 160, it paved the way for the PDP-5 and PDP-8. When compared with the PDP-8, the LINC instruction set was not as well suited for general purpose computation, but the common peripherals needed for lab work such as analog to digital and digital to analog converters were all bundled into the LINC system. Users judged it to be a superb laboratory instrument. One of the major innovations introduced with the LINC was the LINCtape. These tapes could be carelessly pocketed or dropped on the floor without fear of data loss, and they allowed random access to data blocks. DEC improved on this idea slightly to make their DECtape format, and DECtape was widely used with all DEC computers made in the late 1960's and early 1970's. Within a year of the introduction of the PDP-8, DEC released the LINC-8, a machine that combined a PDP-8 with a LINC in one package. This was not a general purpose dual processor, in the sense of allowing both machines to execute in parallel, but rather, a machine with the hardware of both but restrictions that effectively prevented more than one from running at a time. The sales success of the LINC-8 led DEC to re-engineer the machine using TTL logic in the late 1960's; the new version was originally developed as the LINC-8/I, but it was sold as the PDP-12; thousands were sold. Both the LINC-8 and the PDP-12 had impressive consoles, with full sets of lights and switches for the registers of each processor. These machines could run essentially any PDP-8 or LINC software, but because they included instructions for switching between modes, a third body of software was developed that required both instruction sets. One feature of LINC and LINC-8 software is the common use of the graphic display for input-output. These machines were some of the first to include such a display as a standard component, and many programs used the knobs on the analog to digital converter to move a cursor on the display in the way we now use a mouse. LAP, the Linc Assembly Program, was the dominant assembler used on the LINC. WISAL (WISconson Assembly Language) or LAP6-W was the version of this assembler that survived to run on the PDP-12. Curiously, this includes a PDP-8 assembler written in LINC code. LAP-6 DIAL (Display Interactive Assembly Language) evolved from this on the PDP-12 to became the dominant operating system for the PDP-12. The 8K version of this is DIAL MS (Mass Storage), even if it has only two LINCtape drives. These were eventually displaced by the OS/8 variant known as OS/12. Where can I get a PDP-8 today? The CESI machine may still be on the market, for a high price, but generally, you can't buy a new PDP-8 anymore. There are quite a few PDP-8 machines to be found in odd places on the used equipment market. They were widely incorporated into products such as computer controlled machine tools, X-ray diffraction machines, and other industrial and lab equipment. Many of them were sold under the EduSystem marketing program to public schools and universities, and others were used to control laboratory instrumentation. Reuters bought the tail end of the Omnibus based production run. If you can't get real hardware, you can get emulators. Over the years, many PDP-8 emulators have been written; the best of these are indistinguishable from the real machine from a software prespective, and on a modern high-speed RISC platform, these frequently outperform the hardware they are emulating. It is worth noting that the PDP-8, when it was introduced in 1965, was about as fast as was practical with the logic technology used at the time; only by using tricks like memory interleaving or pipelining could the machine have been made much faster. Finally, you can always build your own. The textbook "The Art of Digital Design," second edition, by Franklin Prosser and David Winkel (Prentice-Hall, 1987, ISBN 0-13-046780-4) uses the design of a PDP-8 as a running example. Many students who have used this book were required to build working PDP-8 systems as lab projects. Where can I get PDP-8 documentation? The 1973 Introduction to Programming was probably DEC's definitive manual for this family, but it is out of print, and DEC was in the habit of printing much of their documentation on newsprint with paperback bindings, which is to say, surviving copies tend to be yellow and brittle. DEC distributed huge numbers of catalogs and programming handbooks in this inexpensive paperback format, and these circulate widely on the second-hand market. When research laboratories and electronics shops are being cleaned out, it is still common to find a few dusty, yellowed copies of these books being thrown in the trash. Maintenance manuals are harder to find, but more valuable. Generally, you'll need to find someone who's willing to photocopy one of the few surviving copies. Fortunately, DEC has been friendly to collectors, granting fairly broad letters of permission to reprint obsolete documentation, and the network makes if fairly easy to find someone who has the documentation you need and can get copies. What operating systems were written for the PDP-8? A punched paper-tape library of stand-alone programs was commonly used with the smallest (diskless and tapeless) configurations from the beginning up through the mid 1970's. Many paper tapes from this library survive to the present at various sites! The minimum configuration expected by these tapes is a CPU with 4K memory, and a teletype ASR 33 with paper tape reader and punch. The DECtape Library System was an early DECtape oriented save and restore system that allowed a reel of tape to hold a directory of named files that could be loaded and run on a 4K system. Eventually, this supported a very limited tape-based text editor for on-line program development. This did not use the DECtape's block addressable character; the software was based on minimal ports of the paper-tape based software described above. The 4K Disk Monitor System provided slightly better facilities. This supported on-line program development and it worked with any device that supported 129 word blocks (DECtape, the DF32 disk, or the RF08 disk). MS/8 or the R-L Monitor System, developed starting in 1966 and submitted to DECUS in 1970. This was a disk oriented system, faster than the above, with tricks to make it run quickly on DECtape based systems. POLY BASIC, a BASIC only system submitted to DECUS and later sold by DEC as part of its EduSystem marketing program. P?S/8, developed starting in 1971 from an MS/8 foundation. Runs on minimal PDP-8 configurations, supports device semi-independant I/O and a file system on a random-access device, including DECtape. P?S/8 runs compatably on most PDP-8 machines including DECmates, excepting only the PDP-8/S and PDP-5. P?S/8 is still being developed! OS/8, developed in parallel with P?S/8, became the main PDP-8 programming environment sold by DEC. The minimum configuration required was 8K words and a random-access device to hold the system. For some devices, OS/8 requires 12K. There are a large number of OS/8 versions that are not quite portable across various subsets of the PDP-8 family. OS8 (no slash) may still be viable. It requires 8K of main memory, an extended arithmetic unit, and DECtape hardware. Unlike most PDP-8 operating systems, it uses a directory structure on DECtape compatable with that used on the PDP-10. TSS/8 was developed in 1968 as a timesharing system. It required a minimum of 12K words of memory and a swapping device. It was the standard operating system on the EduSystem 50 which was sold to many small colleges and large public school systems. Each user gets a virtual 4K PDP-8; many of the utilities users ran on these virtual machines were only slightly modified versions of utilities from the Disk Monitor System or paper-tape environments. Other timesharing systems developed for the PDP-8 include MULTI-8, ETOS, MULTOS, and OMNI-8; some of these required nonstandard memory management hardware. By the mid 1970's, some of these were true virtual machine operating systems in the same spirit as IBM's VM-370; they could support some version of OS/8 running on a 32K virtual PDP-8 assigned to each user. Some could support different user operating systems on each virtual machine, others required OS/8 as the user system and only allowed code to execute from virtual field zero of a process's virtual memory. CAPS-8 was a cassette based operating system supporting PAL and BASIC. There are OS/8 utilities to manipulate CAPS-8 cassettes, and the file format on cassette is compatible with a PDP-11 based system called CAPS-11. WPS was DEC's word processing system that was widely used on the 1980's vintage machines with a special WPS keycaps replacing the standard keycaps on the keyboard. This was written in the 1970's, and was the primary system used on the DECmate systems. COS-310, DEC's commercial operating system for the PDP-8, supported the DIBOL language. COS-310 was a derivative of MS/8 and OS/8, but with a new text file format. The file system is OS/8 compatable, and a few applications can run under either COS or OS/8. What programming languages are supported on the PDP-8 The PAL family of assembly languages are as close to a standard assembly language as can be found for the PDP-8. These produce absolute object code and versions of PAL will run on minimally configured machines (but with a small symbol table). Assembly of large programs frequently requires far more memory for symbol table management. MACRO-8 was DEC's first macro assembly language for the PDP-8, but it was never used outside the paper-tape environment except under the OS8 operating system. MACREL and SABR are assembly languages that produce relocatable output. SABR is the final pass for the ALICS II FORTRAN compiler, and MACREL was developed in (unfulfilled) anticipation of similar use. MACREL was heavily used by the DECmate group at DEC. There was also RALF, the relocatable assembler supporting RTPS FORTRAN, and FLAP, an absolute assembler derived from RALF. Both SABR and RALF/FALP are assemblers that handle their intended applications but have quirky and incompatible syntax. A subset of FORTRAN was supported on both the PDP-5 and the original PDP-8. Surviving documentation describes a DEC compiler from 1964 and a compiler written by Information Control Systems from 1968. The latter, ALICS II FORTRAN, was originally a paper tape based compiler, but it forms the basis of the OS/8 8K FORTRAN compiler, and was also adapted to the Disk Monitor System. RTPS FORTRAN required 8K and a floating point processor; it had real-time extensions and was a full implementation of FORTRAN IV (also known as ANSI FORTRAN 66). OS/8 F4 is RTPS FORTRAN stripped of the requirement for hardware floating point (if the hardware is missing, it uses software emulation). FOCAL, an interpretive language comparable to BASIC was available on all models of the family, including the PDP-5 and PDP-8/S. Varsions of FOCAL run under PS/8, P?S/8 and other systems. BASIC was also available, and was widely used on PDP-8 systems sold under the EduSystem marketing program. A paper-tape version was available that ran in 4K, there were versions that ran under OS/8 and TSS/8, there was an 8K stand-alone time-sharing version, and there were many others. DIBOL was DEC's attempt at competing with COBOL in the commercial arena. It was originally implemented under MS/8 but most versions were sold to run under the COS operating system. Algol was available from a fairly early date. At least two Pascal compilers were developed for the PDP-8. One was a Pascal-S interpreter, written in assembler, the other was a Pascal-P compiler with a P-code interpreter written in assembler. At least two LISP interpreters were written for the PDP-8; one runs in 4K, the other can use up to 16K. TECO, the text editor, is available, and is also a general purpose language, and someone is working on a PDP-8 C. The story of TECO on the PDP-8 is convoluted. Russ Ham implemented TECO under his OS8 (without a slash) system. This version of TECO was pirated by the Oregon Museum of Science and Industry (OMSI), where the system was ported to PS/8. Richard Lary and Stan Rabinowitz made it more compatible with other versions of TECO, and the result of work is the version distributed by DECUS. RT-11 TECO for the PDP-11 is a port of this code. Where can I get PDP-8 software? DECUS, the DEC User Society, is still alive and well, and their submission form still lists PAL-8 and FOCAL as languages in which they accept submissions! The DECUS library is available on-line by anonymous FTP at acfcluster.nyu.edu in subdirectory DECUS. To quote the README file from the current on-line catalog, "Items from older DECUS Library catalogs are still also available (provided their media can still be read), but machine readable catalog information is not available for these." Direct questions by E-mail to INFORMATION@DECUS.ORG. There is a young but growing FTPable archive of PDP-8 software at ftp.telebit.com in directory /pub/pdp8. Another archive that contains considerable PDP-8 related material, along with material related to other DEC computers, is at sunsite.unc.edu in directory /pub/academic/computer-science/history/. Where can I get additional information? The file WHAT-IS-A-PDP8, by Charles Lasner contains considerable additional information; this file is included in the FTPable archive cited above. This file gives details of every model of the PDP-8, including the small quirks and incompatabilities that (to be generous) allow software to determine which model it is running on. These quirks also make it all too easy for careless programmers to write almost portable software with very obscure bugs. The mailing list pdp8-lovers@ai.mit.edu reaches a number of PDP-8 owners and users, not all of whom have USENET feeds. The USENET newsgroup alt.sys.pdp8 is fairly new, but someday, the newsgroup and mailing list should be gatewayed to each other. Many "archival" books have included fairly complete descriptions of the PDP-8; among them, "Computer Architecture, Readings and Examples" by Gordon Bell and Allen Newell is among the most complete (and difficult to read). Considering Bell's role in the design of the PDP-8 and the history of DEC, the description in this book should be accurate! What use is a PDP-8 today? What use is a Model T today? Collectors of both come in the same basic classes. First, there are antiquarians who keep an old one in the garage, polished and restored to new condition but hardly ever used. Once a year, they warm it up and use it, just to prove that it still works, but they don't have much practical use. PDP-8 systems maintained by antiquarians are frequently in beautiful shape. Antiquarians worry about dust, chipped paint, and missing switches, and they establish newsgroups and mailing lists to help them locate parts and the advice needed to fix their machines. In the second class are those who find old machines and soup them up, replacing major parts to make a hotrod that only looks like the original from the outside, or keeping the old mechanism and putting it to uses that were never intended. Some PDP-8 owners, for example, are building PDP-8 systems with modern SCSI disk interfaces! There is serious interest in some quarters in constructing an omnibus board that would support an IDE disk of the variety that was mass-produced for the IBM PC/AT. Last, there are the old folks who still use their old machines for their intended purposes long after any sane economic analysis would recommend such use. If it ain't broke, don't fix it, and if it can be fixed, why bother replacing it? Both Model T Fords and the classic PDP-8 machines are simple enough that end users can maintain and repair them indefinitely. All you need to keep a vintage -8 running are a stock of inexpensive silicon diodes and a stock of 2N3639B or better, 2N3640 transistors. Unlike most modern personal computers, PDP-8 systems were routinely sold with complete maintenance manuals; these included schematic diagrams, explanations of not only how to use the devices, but how they are built, and suggestions to those considering building their own peripherals. Compared with many so-called "open systems" of today, the PDP-8 seems to have been far better documented and far more open. Finally, the PDP-8 is such a minimal machine that it is an excellent introduction to how computers really work. Over the years, many students have built complete working PDP-8 systems from scratch as lab projects, and the I/O environment on a PDP-8 is simple enough that it is a very appropriate environment for learning operating system programming techniques. Who's Who? C. Gordon Bell is generally credited with the original design of the PDP-8. He also recommended what became the PDP-11 when that design was competing with the design that probably became the NOVA, and as vice president of research, he oversaw the development of the DEC VAX family. Ben Gurley designed most of the big DEC machines, starting with the PDP-1. Ken Olson ran DEC from the beginning. Wesley Clark developed the LINC while working at Lincoln Labs; this was the first 12 bit minicomputer built with DEC parts.